Pepdexpepdex
← All compounds

AICAR

ZMP, AMPK activator, ATX-304, O-304 · AMPK activator (unapproved)

Research reference only. Pepdex does not sell, supply or track this compound, and nothing here is guidance to use it — this page exists so the evidence and the risks are visible.

What it is

A cell-energy-sensor (AMPK) activator with decades of legitimate lab use and a doping history — part of the same 2008-era "exercise mimetic" excitement as Cardarine. ATX-304 (O-304) is a distinct, clinical-stage AMPK activator that circulates under the same umbrella; it is not the same molecule.

How it works

A naming point that matters: the compound given in human studies is acadesine (AICA-riboside), which cells take up and phosphorylate into ZMP, the actual AMPK-activating molecule. Products and papers use the names interchangeably and they are not the same chemical species. What ZMP does is activate AMPK, the enzyme that acts as a cell's low-energy alarm — when it fires, cells switch from building to burning, increasing glucose uptake and fat oxidation. Because exercise activates AMPK too, AICAR became the original "exercise mimetic" after mice given it ran substantially further without training. Two facts constrain everything else about it: it is not orally active in any meaningful way, and the effects that made it famous came from injection over weeks.

What human evidence shows

Real human infusion studies exist (cardiology contexts, decades old) plus the famous mouse endurance work. For fat-loss use: nothing.

The studies, one by one

  • NONE SHOWN for endurance or body composition in healthy people. Its human programme was substantial and cardiac: the RED-CABG trial randomised 3,080 patients undergoing bypass surgery, with death, non-fatal stroke or mechanical circulatory support at day 28 as its primary endpoint. It was stopped for futility at 5.1% versus 5.0%. That is a large, null, phase-3 human dataset — it does not support performance use, but it is not a thin evidence base.
  • The famous result is the untrained-mouse endurance study. Attempts to reproduce anything comparable in humans have not established a performance benefit.
  • Oral bioavailability was measured under 5% in one human study of a solution formulation. The controlled human evidence used a different route entirely and was null on its endpoint, so no self-administered product is supported by it; low exposure is also not proof of no exposure or no risk, particularly when product contents are unverified.
  • It is prohibited in sport and has featured in doping allegations and investigations. Be careful with the cycling story that circulates: a 2025 review reported no positive AICAR test, and the well-documented 2013 cycling positives concerned a different compound entirely.
  • Cost is its own quiet fact: producing it at the amounts animal studies used is expensive enough that cheap oral products invite obvious questions about what is actually in them.

Half-life and how long it lasts

Effectively not orally active — human work used intravenous administration, with a short half-life. This single fact separates the evidence from the product: nothing sold as an oral capsule delivers what the studies delivered. Research-chemical supply with unverified identity and purity.

Risks

AICAR is a purine pathway intermediate; systemic exposure has documented uric-acid and metabolic effects in the infusion literature. Long-term activation of a master energy switch is uncharacterized in humans. WADA-prohibited (and actually detected in cycling). ATX-304's early-trial data does not transfer to any product sold outside its trials.

Who should never touch it

  • Anyone considering any self-administered product, none of which is supported by the controlled human evidence
  • Anyone with gout or chronic kidney disease, both of which the large human trial excluded
  • Anyone in tested sport, where it is prohibited
  • Anyone pregnant or breastfeeding

Interactions worth knowing

  • Interactions remain uncharacterised. More informative than mechanistic speculation: the large cardiac surgery trial EXCLUDED people with gout or chronic kidney disease, and restricted caffeine, adenosine, dipyridamole and allopurinol. Exclusions are not contraindications, but they reflect what the developers were actually cautious about.
  • Any tested sport, where it is prohibited.

What a clinician would watch

  • There is nothing useful to monitor for a compound with no established human performance effect and no oral delivery.
  • For anyone who has taken it by any route: AMPK activation affects glucose handling, so blood-sugar effects are mechanistically plausible and unstudied at these exposures.

What stopping looks like

No withdrawal syndrome has been described. For oral products the measured bioavailability under 5% means exposure was likely minimal, though unverified product contents make that an assumption rather than a reassurance.

Myth vs evidence

It gives you endurance without training.

That describes injected mice. Human studies were in cardiac and metabolic settings and did not establish a performance benefit.

Oral AICAR works.

Measured oral bioavailability was under 5% in a human study, and the controlled human trials were null on their endpoint anyway. Nothing here supports any self-administered product.

It is safe because it is a natural metabolite analogue.

Resembling something the body makes says nothing about what supraphysiologic exposure does, and no such dataset exists.

Legal status

US: not FDA-approved for human use; WADA-prohibited.

Research on this compound

Papers about this compound, not proof of the claims above. A title says what was studied, which is sometimes a negative result or a different question entirely.

  • AICAr, a Widely Used AMPK Activator with Important AMPK-Independent Effects: A Systematic Review
  • Liposome-encapsulated AICAR hydrogel regulates macrophage metabolic reprogramming via SIK1 activation to alleviate osteoarthritis

Evidence base

B2,417 research papers
established literature

Real human evidence: randomised trial reports, or review-level evidence backed by at least one human trial report.

phase 3/4
0
randomised
5
reviews
3
human trials
19

Counts are of published papers, not distinct trials, and they nest rather than add up: PubMed files every randomised trial as a clinical trial too. They measure how much research exists — not whether this works or is safe for you.

Research (12)

Turn AICAR into a plan that's yours

The info above is free. Membership makes it personal, the Coach answers questions about your exact stack, the Stack tracks it for you, and the Verified Sources shows you how to vet what you buy.

  • AI Coach, ask anything about your stack. It does the dosing math, flags interactions, and tells you what to do next.
  • Personal Stack, save your protocol, track it across devices, log doses, get a heads-up before a vial runs out.
  • Verified Sources, the vetted reference for checking quality and sourcing, members only.
Become a member, from $4.99/week

Cancel anytime · or save with $59.99/yr · Coach + Stack included

Where next