MariTide
Maridebart cafraglutide / AMG 133 · GLP-1/GIP antibody-peptide conjugate (investigational)
What it is
Amgen's long-interval obesity candidate — an antibody-peptide conjugate notable for GIP receptor BLOCKADE (the opposite bet from tirzepatide's GIP activation). Currently in Phase 3.
How it works
Maritide (maridebart cafraglutide, formerly AMG 133) works differently from every other drug in this space, and the difference is the interesting part. It is an antibody-peptide conjugate: a monoclonal antibody that BLOCKS the GIP receptor, with GLP-1 agonist peptides chemically attached to it. So it agonises GLP-1 while antagonising GIP — the opposite of tirzepatide, which agonises both. That two drugs with opposite GIP actions both produce weight loss is one of the genuinely unresolved puzzles in metabolic pharmacology. The antibody backbone also gives it a very long half-life, which is what makes monthly or less-frequent administration plausible.
What human evidence shows
Phase 2 data reported large weight loss with infrequent dosing; the same program made news for GI tolerability challenges that its trial design continues to work through. Published evidence remains incomplete while Phase 3 runs.
The studies, one by one
- INVESTIGATIONAL — not approved anywhere. Phase II results reported substantial weight reduction, and a phase III programme is underway.
- Be careful with the slow-regain story: that observation comes from exploratory phase I work, not from the published phase II report, which evaluated outcomes through 52 weeks. Phase II part 2 was designed to examine maintenance, reduced-frequency dosing and discontinuation, and durability after stopping has not been publicly established in the primary publication.
- Gastrointestinal adverse effects were common and were dose-limiting, consistent with the class.
- Its GIP antagonism versus tirzepatide's GIP agonism remains unexplained — both approaches produce weight loss, and the field does not have a settled account of why.
- Everything about long-term safety is unknown, as it is for any investigational agent.
Half-life and how long it lasts
An antibody-peptide conjugate with a very long half-life, which is why infrequent administration is possible and why effects persist well after stopping. It is given by injection. There is no approved product; anything sold as it outside a clinical trial is not what it claims to be.
Risks
Trial-reported GI tolerability problems, and an antibody-conjugate's long half-life means a bad reaction persists for weeks, not days. Complex biologics of this class are beyond the manufacturing reach of unregulated labs — any purported product outside a registered study cannot be assumed to be the investigational drug.
Who should never touch it
- Everyone outside a clinical trial — it is investigational and unavailable through any lawful route
- Anyone buying something sold under this name online, which cannot be what it claims
Interactions worth knowing
- No characterised interaction profile outside the trial setting.
- As a class, GLP-1 agonism slows gastric emptying, which can alter absorption of other oral medicines and raises aspiration risk around anaesthesia.
Stacking interactions
Documented interactions with other things people research. A compound not listed here does not mean the combination is safe — only that no specific interaction is on file.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
Combining two GLP-1 receptor agonists is not recommended: current GLP-1 labeling advises against concurrent use with another GLP-1 agonist, and stacking the same receptor action compounds GI and hypoglycaemia risk without a distinct mechanism.
What a clinician would watch
- This is an investigational drug available only through clinical trials. There is no context in which self-directed use is appropriate, and no monitoring list changes that.
- For anyone in a trial: monitoring is defined by the protocol and the investigators.
What stopping looks like
Its long half-life means exposure persists for a considerable period after the last administration. The slower-regain observation people cite comes from exploratory phase I work rather than the published phase II report, so it is a preliminary signal rather than an established property — and whether it holds at scale is one of the questions the phase III programme exists to answer.
Myth vs evidence
“It is a stronger tirzepatide.”
It does the opposite thing at the GIP receptor. Calling it stronger misses that it is a different pharmacological strategy whose mechanism the field has not settled.
“Monthly dosing means fewer side effects.”
Gastrointestinal effects were common and dose-limiting in phase II. Frequency changes convenience, not receptor pharmacology.
“You can buy it now.”
It is investigational and not approved anywhere. Anything sold under that name outside a trial is not the drug.
Legal status
US: investigational, trial-access only.
Evidence base
early literature
Early human evidence: at least one human trial report, and not much beyond it.
- phase 3/4
- 0
- randomised
- 2
- reviews
- 0
- human trials
- 2
Counts are of published papers, not distinct trials, and they nest rather than add up: PubMed files every randomised trial as a clinical trial too. They measure how much research exists — not whether this works or is safe for you.
Research (12)
- Once-Monthly Maridebart Cafraglutide for the Treatment of Obesity - A Phase 2 TrialN Engl J Med · 2025
- Efficacy and Safety of GLP-1 Medicines for Type 2 Diabetes and ObesityDiabetes Care · 2024
- A GIPR antagonist conjugated to GLP-1 analogues promotes weight loss with improved metabolic parameters in preclinical and phase 1 settingsNat Metab · 2024
- Beyond the pancreas: contrasting cardiometabolic actions of GIP and GLP1Nat Rev Endocrinol · 2023
- Novel GLP-1-based Medications for Type 2 Diabetes and ObesityEndocr Rev · 2026
- Multifunctional incretin peptides in therapies for type 2 diabetes, obesity and associated co-morbiditiesPeptides · 2025
- Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor signaling alleviates gut inflammation in miceJCI Insight · 2024
- The Paradox and Future of GLP-1/GIP Combination Therapies: Efficacy and MechanismsAnnu Rev Nutr · 2026
- A metabolic comparison of GIPR agonism versus GIPR antagonism in male miceDiabetes Obes Metab · 2026
- An update on peptide-based therapies for type 2 diabetes and obesityPeptides · 2023
- The Premise of the Paradox: Examining the Evidence That Motivated GIPR Agonist and Antagonist Drug Development ProgramsJ Clin Med · 2025
- Characterization of genetic variants of GIPR reveals a contribution of β-arrestin to metabolic phenotypesNat Metab · 2024
Turn MariTide into a plan that's yours
The info above is free. Membership makes it personal, the Coach answers questions about your exact stack, the Stack tracks it for you, and the Verified Sources shows you how to vet what you buy.
- ✓ AI Coach, ask anything about your stack. It does the dosing math, flags interactions, and tells you what to do next.
- ✓ Personal Stack, save your protocol, track it across devices, log doses, get a heads-up before a vial runs out.
- ✓ Verified Sources, the vetted reference for checking quality and sourcing, members only.
Cancel anytime · or save with $59.99/yr · Coach + Stack included