Pepdexpepdex
← All compounds

Anavar

Oxandrolone / var · Anabolic-androgenic steroid (oral)

Research reference only. Pepdex does not sell, supply or track this compound, and nothing here is guidance to use it — this page exists so the evidence and the risks are visible.

What it is

The most-used oral steroid in the recreational world — mild reputation, strength and hardness with little water, popular in cutting runs and among women on a reputation for lower virilisation risk — though no reliable comparative ranking across steroids actually establishes that, and the label documents potentially irreversible virilisation.

How it works

Oxandrolone is a 17-alpha-alkylated DHT derivative: the 17-alpha alkylation is what gives it oral activity and also what drives its hepatic risk. It belongs to the hepatotoxic 17-alpha-alkylated subgroup of oral anabolic steroids — a subgroup, not every orally active androgen. It does not aromatise, so there is no estrogen pathway, and its androgen-receptor binding is modest, which is the pharmacological basis of its "mild" reputation. That reputation is the problem: whatever it means, it does not extend to lipids or to suppression, and almost every misunderstanding of this drug comes from assuming it does.

What human evidence shows

One of the few AAS with real modern trial history (burn recovery, HIV wasting) — it preserves and adds lean mass. The "mild" label refers to androgenic side effects, not to safety: it is a 17-alpha-alkylated oral, which is exactly the liver-loading class.

The studies, one by one

  • This is, unexpectedly, one of the best-studied anabolic steroids in humans — because it had real clinical indications and real trials rather than a purely non-medical history.
  • Severe-burn medicine is the deepest literature: the main 235-person acute-burn trial reported lean-mass retention and shorter normalised acute hospital stay — wound healing was not a primary outcome, and the long-term paediatric follow-ups did not establish a general stay benefit. FDA's 2023 withdrawal was not a toxicity-versus-efficacy tradeoff on the burn data: it concluded there was NO substantial evidence of effectiveness for the drug's actual approved indications, and that the overall benefit-risk was unfavourable, citing peliosis hepatis, sometimes-fatal liver tumours and cholestatic hepatitis.
  • It carried FDA indications for weight regain after significant loss, and was studied in HIV wasting, alcoholic hepatitis, Turner syndrome and Duchenne muscular dystrophy — a genuinely broad clinical record.
  • The burn literature also produced the clearest lipid warning: HDL suppression was marked and consistent, in supervised patients, at therapeutic exposures.
  • What does not exist is a trial of physique use in healthy adults. Graded honestly: lean-mass effects in catabolic disease are MODERATE, the burn length-of-stay finding is LIMITED, and healthy physique or cutting benefit is NONE SHOWN — burn and wasting patients do not establish what happens in a healthy body, in either direction.

Half-life and how long it lasts

An oral with a short half-life — roughly nine to ten hours, far shorter than injectable esters — so blood levels rise and fall within a day rather than persisting for weeks. That short window is why people wrongly assume its effects on lipids and the hormonal axis are equally short-lived; suppression and HDL depression build over the course of use and do not clear on the same schedule as the drug. Detection in anti-doping testing outlasts the pharmacological effect substantially.

Risks

Lipids get wrecked fast — HDL suppression from orals is among the worst per-milligram. Hepatic strain (17aa), full HPTA suppression like every AAS, hair loss in the predisposed, and for women virilization that is dose- and duration-dependent and partly irreversible. Unregulated products can be mislabelled or contaminated, and composition cannot be verified from the label.

Who should never touch it

  • Class-level severe outcomes reported with anabolic steroids, which no compound here is exempt from: cardiac arrest, heart attack, thickened heart muscle, heart failure and stroke; serious liver injury; and mania, paranoia, psychosis, hostility, aggression, dependence and depression on withdrawal.
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding: androgens can cause fetal harm including virilisation of a female fetus. Avoid in both.
  • Anyone with existing liver disease or an unexplained enzyme elevation — the FDA specifically cited peliosis hepatis and hepatic tumours when withdrawing approval.
  • Anyone with an already poor lipid profile, familial hyperlipidaemia, or cardiovascular disease.
  • Anyone taking warfarin or another anticoagulant without a prescriber managing the interaction.
  • Women who are pregnant, could become pregnant, or are unwilling to accept a non-zero risk of permanent voice change.
  • Anyone hoping to preserve fertility in the near term.

Interactions worth knowing

  • Anticoagulants — oxandrolone has one of the better-documented warfarin interactions in this class, capable of substantially increasing anticoagulant effect. This is a genuine clinical interaction, not a theoretical one.
  • Concurrent hepatotoxic exposures can increase risk; no safe combination has been established.
  • Diabetes medication — glucose control can shift.
  • Alcohol and other hepatically-cleared drugs add to the same load the alkylation already imposes.

Stacking interactions

Documented interactions with other things people research. A compound not listed here does not mean the combination is safe — only that no specific interaction is on file.

CautionWinstrol

Each of these oral steroids has independently been associated with liver injury. Pair-specific safety data are lacking, and concurrent exposure may increase hepatic risk.

CautionAnadrol

Each of these oral steroids has independently been associated with liver injury. Pair-specific safety data are lacking, and concurrent exposure may increase hepatic risk.

CautionDianabol

Each of these oral steroids has independently been associated with liver injury. Pair-specific safety data are lacking, and concurrent exposure may increase hepatic risk.

CautionTurinabol

Each of these oral steroids has independently been associated with liver injury. Pair-specific safety data are lacking, and concurrent exposure may increase hepatic risk.

CautionSuperdrol

Each of these oral steroids has independently been associated with liver injury. Pair-specific safety data are lacking, and concurrent exposure may increase hepatic risk.

CautionHalotestin

Each of these oral steroids has independently been associated with liver injury. Pair-specific safety data are lacking, and concurrent exposure may increase hepatic risk.

CautionAnabolic steroids

Each of these oral steroids has independently been associated with liver injury. Pair-specific safety data are lacking, and concurrent exposure may increase hepatic risk.

What a clinician would watch

  • Lipid panel — the headline. HDL suppression is disproportionate to this drug's gentle reputation and shows up quickly and reliably.
  • Liver enzymes (ALT/AST) plus GGT and bilirubin — ALT and AST alone are ambiguous in people who lift, since training raises them without any liver problem; GGT helps separate the two.
  • Total and free testosterone, LH and FSH — suppression happens at ordinary exposures despite persistent claims that it does not.
  • Blood pressure.
  • In women: virilisation can be IRREVERSIBLE, and the label-level response to voice deepening, facial hair growth or clitoral enlargement is stopping and medical review — not continued observation. There is no lab test that substitutes; by the time change is unmistakable, some of it may be permanent.

What stopping looks like

The compound itself clears quickly, but the two things that matter lag well behind it. Lipid abnormalities can persist after the drug is gone, with no established recovery timeline. The hormonal axis follows its own course, and because people are told this drug is mild, the low-testosterone window afterwards frequently arrives unexpected — flat mood, low libido, fatigue in someone who was assured none of this applied to them.

Myth vs evidence

It is mild, so it does not suppress you.

Suppression is documented at ordinary exposures. "Mild" refers to liver stress relative to other orals and to virilisation risk relative to other androgens — it was never a statement about the hormonal axis, and treating it as one is how people end up in an unplanned recovery.

It is the safe one for women.

It is the most-studied option in women, but no reliable ranking establishes it as the safest — and virilisation still occurs. Voice deepening and some other virilising changes can persist or be irreversible.

Its short half-life means the side effects clear quickly too.

The drug clears in hours; the lipid and axis effects it caused do not, and no reliable recovery timeline has been established. Different clocks entirely.

It is barely a steroid — more like a strong supplement.

It is a Schedule III anabolic steroid with genuine clinical potency, an FDA indication history, and marked, clinically adverse lipid effects that its mild reputation hides — though no standardised cross-steroid ranking exists to crown any compound the worst.

Legal status

US: Schedule III anabolic steroid under the CSA — and as of 2023 there is NO FDA-approved oxandrolone product: the FDA withdrew approval of Oxandrin and the referencing generics, having determined they were withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness. Anything circulating now is an unapproved drug.

Research on this compound

Papers about this compound, not proof of the claims above. A title says what was studied, which is sometimes a negative result or a different question entirely.

  • Oxandrolone for burn patients: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials from 2005 to 2025
  • The efficacy and safety of androgen analog oxandrolone in improving clinical outcomes in burn patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  • Oxandrolone in the Treatment of Burn Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Evidence base

A664 research papers
established literature

Strong human evidence: either a phase 3 or 4 trial report alongside review-level evidence, or ten or more randomised controlled trial reports.

phase 3/4
0
randomised
92
reviews
19
human trials
134

Counts are of published papers, not distinct trials, and they nest rather than add up: PubMed files every randomised trial as a clinical trial too. They measure how much research exists — not whether this works or is safe for you.

Research (12)

Turn Anavar into a plan that's yours

The info above is free. Membership makes it personal, the Coach answers questions about your exact stack, the Stack tracks it for you, and the Verified Sources shows you how to vet what you buy.

  • AI Coach, ask anything about your stack. It does the dosing math, flags interactions, and tells you what to do next.
  • Personal Stack, save your protocol, track it across devices, log doses, get a heads-up before a vial runs out.
  • Verified Sources, the vetted reference for checking quality and sourcing, members only.
Become a member, from $4.99/week

Cancel anytime · or save with $59.99/yr · Coach + Stack included

Where next