Pepdexpepdex
← All compounds

SR-9009

Stenabolic · Rev-erb agonist (unapproved)

Research reference only. Pepdex does not sell, supply or track this compound, and nothing here is guidance to use it — this page exists so the evidence and the risks are visible.

What it is

A circadian-biology research tool (Rev-erb agonist) from Scripps that showed increased mitochondrial activity and exercise capacity in mice, marketed since as "exercise in a bottle."

How it works

SR9009 (Stenabolic) is a synthetic agonist at REV-ERB, a nuclear receptor that helps run the circadian clock and, through it, genes controlling mitochondrial number and metabolic rate. In mice, activating it increased mitochondrial content and running endurance — findings that produced the "exercise mimetic" framing the whole grey market rests on. The problem is not the mechanism, it is the delivery: SR9009 is very poorly absorbed orally, so the dramatic mouse results came from injected administration that oral capsules cannot reproduce.

What human evidence shows

Mouse data only. The foundational exercise studies used injected administration in mice; human pharmacokinetics and oral exposure are not established, and some of its cellular effects occur independently of Rev-erb — the mechanism story is less clean than marketed. No human trials exist.

The studies, one by one

  • NONE. There is no human trial of SR9009 of any size, phase or quality — it never entered clinical development.
  • The foundational exercise-capacity result came from six mice per group and used non-oral administration. Later animal work using oral gavage reported limited systemic exposure. Neither supports any self-administered route in humans — the point is evidentiary, not a comparison of routes.
  • Human pharmacokinetics have NEVER been characterised — no oral bioavailability figure or half-life exists for people. Mouse oral gavage showed limited systemic exposure, which is suggestive rather than a human number, and the injected mouse endurance result cannot be extrapolated to a marketed oral capsule.
  • The mechanistic story is worse than unsettled. In cells engineered to lack both REV-ERB receptors entirely, SR9009 still reduced proliferation and mitochondrial respiration — so it does things that have nothing to do with its supposed target. Investigators also flagged nitrothiophene toxicophores in its structure. Human significance of either finding is unknown, which is not the same as benign.
  • It is prohibited in sport and appears in doping sanctions, which is where most of the analytical data on real-world products comes from.

Half-life and how long it lasts

Human pharmacokinetics have never been characterised — no bioavailability or half-life figure exists for people. Animal work using oral administration reported limited systemic exposure. Sold as research-chemical supply of unverified identity, and analytical testing of this category routinely finds mislabelled contents.

Risks

Unknown by absence of study, which is not the same as safe. Perturbing circadian clock machinery is a systemic intervention, not a targeted one. WADA bans it.

Who should never touch it

  • Everyone — a compound with zero human data, a delivery problem that undermines even its animal evidence, and unverified supply
  • Anyone in tested sport, where it is prohibited
  • Anyone pregnant or breastfeeding

Interactions worth knowing

  • No characterised human interaction profile exists.
  • Circadian biology is its target, so effects on sleep are mechanistically plausible and entirely unstudied in people.
  • Any tested sport, where it is prohibited.

What a clinician would watch

  • There is nothing meaningful to monitor, and offering a panel would imply a level of knowledge that does not exist for a compound with zero human data.
  • The honest position: no human study has ever established what it does in a person, at any exposure, over any duration.

What stopping looks like

Nothing is known about stopping because nothing is known about taking it. No withdrawal syndrome is described, and no established effect exists to lose.

Myth vs evidence

It is exercise in a pill.

That phrase describes a six-mice-per-group animal study using non-oral administration. No human pharmacokinetic data exists at all, so nobody can say what any product delivers in a person.

The mouse endurance data will transfer.

It has never been tested in a person, and the compound has documented cellular effects unrelated to its supposed receptor target.

No reported side effects means it is safe.

No reported effects of any kind, because no human study exists. Absence of data is not a safety record.

Legal status

US: not FDA-approved for human use; unscheduled. Marketing for human use may violate the FD&C Act.

Evidence base

D147 research papers
substantial literature

Studied, but no human trial report found. A real literature that is preclinical as far as these counts can see.

phase 3/4
0
randomised
0
reviews
0
human trials
0

Counts are of published papers, not distinct trials, and they nest rather than add up: PubMed files every randomised trial as a clinical trial too. They measure how much research exists — not whether this works or is safe for you.

Research (12)

Turn SR-9009 into a plan that's yours

The info above is free. Membership makes it personal, the Coach answers questions about your exact stack, the Stack tracks it for you, and the Verified Sources shows you how to vet what you buy.

  • AI Coach, ask anything about your stack. It does the dosing math, flags interactions, and tells you what to do next.
  • Personal Stack, save your protocol, track it across devices, log doses, get a heads-up before a vial runs out.
  • Verified Sources, the vetted reference for checking quality and sourcing, members only.
Become a member, from $4.99/week

Cancel anytime · or save with $59.99/yr · Coach + Stack included

Where next